Number of Seats/Users: Loyoly offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Loyoly that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Loyoly. Loyoly reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Loyoly offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Loyoly. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Loyoly often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that feedback on Loyoly is very positive, with satisfaction consistently close to the maximum scores.

From what our Spendbase clients tell us, the key value pillars look like this:

1) Core strengths

• Time & cost savings
• Many clients explicitly mention “gagner du temps” in UGC collection and campaign management.

• This translates into fewer manual tasks around ambassador coordination, content chasing, and reporting.

• UGC & ambassador activation

• Loyoly is seen as very effective for:

  • Creating and managing ambassador missions
  • Collecting UGC and reviews at scale
  • Maintaining constant brand presence on social platforms

• Ease of use & onboarding

• Interface often described as clear and simple.

• Once onboarded, mission creation and moderation are considered straightforward.

• Support & partnership mindset

• Clients repeatedly highlight:
  • Fast, reactive support
  • Tailored help during setup
  • A roadmap that moves in the “right direction”

2) Pain points & missing pieces

Our internal data also surfaces recurring friction points:

• Product test programs
• Setup and linkage with lists can be complex.
• Lack of a “new signups” area and fine-grained segmentation between “clients ambassadeurs” vs “influenceurs”.

• Demand for integrated messaging and richer forms (e.g., detailed questionnaires).

• ROI visibility

• Some clients struggle to clearly quantify ROI internally.

• Metrics exist, but they are not always enough to convince all internal teams.

• Channel & audience coverage

• Missions are perceived as:
  • Strongly focused on social networks
  • Better suited to 15–40 age range

• Clients ask for:

  • More missions for senior audiences
  • Broader coverage across more platforms.

• Communication & diffusion

• Email performance tracking to ambassadors could be clearer.
• Program diffusion (getting people into the program) can require extra guidance.

3) Spendbase takeaways for value and pricing

• Loyoly’s perceived value leans heavily on:
• Time saved on UGC and ambassador management
• Quality of support
• Discount and pricing discussions can fairly point to:
• Still-maturing ROI reporting
• Complexity around product test programs
• Gaps in senior-oriented missions and broader channel coverage