Number of Seats/Users: CyLock EVA offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows CyLock EVA that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from CyLock EVA. CyLock EVA reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: CyLock EVA offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from CyLock EVA. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: CyLock EVA often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that CyLock EVA is hitting a very sweet spot between strong security capabilities and ease of use, especially for SMEs and web-focused teams.

Overall sentiment
– Almost all Spendbase clients rate the tool at the top of the scale
– Feedback is consistently about “simple”, “fast”, and “clear outputs”
– EVA is seen as “enterprise-grade” but still accessible to non‑technical staff

Key value drivers our clients point out

1) Usability and onboarding
Our internal data shows that:
– Installation and first scans are quick and guided
– The interface is intuitive enough for non‑security experts
– Clients appreciate being able to run scans autonomously, with minimal help

2) Reporting quality (big differentiator)
Spendbase clients highlight a lot of value in:
– Dual‑layer reports:
– A strategic / executive summary for decision makers
– A technical section with detailed remediation for IT
– Clear, Italian‑language reporting that can be handed directly to external technicians
– Concrete, ready‑to‑apply remediation steps that speed up fixes

3) Coverage and detection
Our internal data shows that:
– CyLock EVA finds a high number of vulnerabilities, including “hidden” ones
– It’s effective on websites, plugins, extensions, and broader infrastructure
– OSINT / Dark Web cyber risk intelligence is seen as a strong plus for visibility on external threats

4) Speed and cost-effectiveness
– Scans and report generation are fast, enabling quick response
– Price–value ratio is repeatedly praised, especially by SMEs and agencies
– Automation significantly cuts down time compared to manual penetration tests

Areas where clients see room for improvement

Spendbase clients mention a few recurring asks:
– More customizable and schematic reporting layouts (especially for non‑technical audiences)
– Result history and better project / admin management (locking, grouping projects)
– Additional dashboard widgets for instant visibility of critical issues
– Slight UX polish in the user panel for less technical users

Risk / limitations to keep in mind
– As with any automated VA tool, expert review is still recommended for prioritizing actions
– Some hosting environments may see scans as “aggressive,” requiring coordination with providers

In short, our internal data shows CyLock EVA is a strong fit for cost‑conscious organizations that want serious vulnerability coverage, clear reports, and minimal operational friction.