Number of Seats/Users: {post.post_title} offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows {post.post_title} that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. {post.post_title} reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: {post.post_title} offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: {post.post_title} often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Evalart delivers strong value for HR and recruitment teams, especially when it’s used in the right package size and with the right mix of tests.

From what our Spendbase clients share, the key strengths are:

• Ease of use & adoption
• Very intuitive interface for both recruiters and candidates
• Quick to create candidates, assign tests, and track status

• Good fit even for small teams without in‑house IT

• Breadth and flexibility of assessments

• Strong coverage for:
  • IT and coding roles
  • Sales, customer service, and general aptitude

• Ability to:

  • Create tests from scratch
  • Customize existing tests to company context
  • Build complete batteries for each role

• Impact on hiring process

• Significant reduction in screening time
• Better technical validation and less bias in shortlisting

• Useful, clear reports that support final hiring decisions

• Service & support

• Fast, helpful support team
• Willingness to create new tests on request
• Perceived as a “strategic ally” in selection

At the same time, our internal data highlights recurring gaps that are worth factoring into negotiation and plan selection:

• Test catalog coverage
• Demand for more:
  • Administrative and managerial tests
  • Personality, culture, and climate assessments
  • Industrial safety and specific soft skills
  • Higher-difficulty programming questions

• Some tests feel slightly outdated and need manual tweaking

• Product experience

• Test builder can feel slow or “heavy” when creating complex exams
• Navigation quirks (e.g., returning to first page of candidates)

• Missing features some clients expect:

  • Graphical results for DISC
  • Ability to compare candidate profiles
  • Clear differentiation of user roles and audit trails

• Commercial and billing aspects

• Desire for:
  • Alerts when test credits are running low
  • Smoother payment flows
  • More transparency and guidance on which tests to use for each role

From a Spendbase discount perspective, this pattern usually means:

• Teams get strong ROI when they:
• Lean heavily on IT and technical tests
• Use customization to fill catalog gaps
• There is leverage to negotiate:
• Better pricing on higher test volumes
• Commitments on catalog expansions or feature updates tied to contract terms

In short, Evalart is perceived as a high-value, flexible tool, with clear room for optimization around catalog depth, UX refinements, and credit management.