Number of Seats/Users: Silverfort offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Silverfort that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Silverfort. Silverfort reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Silverfort offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Silverfort. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Silverfort often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Silverfort is generally very well received by our clients, especially those running strong on-prem Active Directory environments and mixed hybrid setups.

Overall sentiment
Most Spendbase clients rate Silverfort highly (around 4–5 stars on average), mainly because it solves a painful security and identity gap without forcing major infrastructure changes.

Key strengths our clients highlight
– Straightforward rollout
– Fast installation and implementation
– Clear, simple platform structure
– Intuitive, well-organized interface that doesn’t overwhelm IT teams

• MFA for on‑prem AD and legacy systems
• Ability to add MFA to Microsoft Active Directory where it’s not supported natively
• Coverage across many protocols, users, and targets (including legacy apps, infrastructure, file systems)

• Especially valued for privileged accounts, where clients now consider MFA a “must-have”

• Security and visibility

• Noticeable increase in security posture and transparency around authentications
• Unified identity protection across different environments, seen as “unique” compared to other tools
• Fits well alongside existing IAM investments (AD, Azure AD, Okta, etc.) instead of replacing them

From a Spendbase discount and cost-efficiency point of view, clients often mention that Silverfort helps them:
– Avoid or delay expensive migrations of all authentication flows into Azure AD
– Achieve MFA coverage for legacy and niche systems without buying multiple point products
– Consolidate identity protection, which reduces tool sprawl and ongoing license overhead

Main pain points our clients report
While satisfaction is strong, a few recurring themes appear:

• Logging and diagnostics
• Some “authentication error” entries in the logs are unclear

• Clients would like better explanations and more transparent troubleshooting data

• Dependence on support

• For edge cases in logs and advanced scenarios, clients rely heavily on vendor support
• Feedback on support is generally positive, but there’s a desire for more self-service clarity in the product itself

In summary, our internal data shows that Spendbase clients see Silverfort as a high-value way to bring modern MFA and unified identity protection to environments that were previously hard or impossible to secure, with the main improvement area being clearer logging and diagnostics.