Number of Seats/Users: Allsorter offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Allsorter that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Allsorter. Allsorter reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Allsorter offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Allsorter. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Allsorter often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Allsorter delivers strong value for recruitment teams, especially where time savings and consistency of CV formatting are important.

Overall sentiment
Most Spendbase clients rate Allsorter very highly, with clear satisfaction around productivity gains and support quality. There are some pain points around parsing accuracy and formatting quirks, but these rarely outweigh the core benefits.

What Spendbase clients like most
Our insights group the positives into a few clear themes:

• Time savings & efficiency
• Typical formatting time drops from ~15 minutes to under 5 minutes per CV.

• Teams can process more candidates per day without adding headcount.

• Standardisation & branding

• CVs become consistent and on-brand across the whole business.

• Especially valued for client-facing shortlists and executive submissions.

• Ease of use

• Interface is intuitive, quick to learn, and works even with poorly formatted source CVs.

• Works with many formats: PDF, Word, and job board profiles.

• Support & customisation

• Clients highlight very responsive account managers.
• Templates are tailored and can be iterated quickly to match internal standards.
• Integration with ATS systems is called out as smooth when enabled.

Key friction points
Our internal data also flags recurring issues that can impact perceived ROI:

• Parsing and formatting accuracy
• Occasional loss or misplacement of information, especially:
  • Skills sections
  • Locations
  • Complex job histories (multiple roles in same company)

• Random spacing, page breaks, and text box quirks on some CVs.

• Manual clean-up still required

• Many clients say Allsorter gets them “90–95% there,” but they still:
  • Tidy spacing
  • Fix skills layout
  • Correct a few missed fields

Value perspective for Spendbase users
From a discount and spend-optimization angle, Allsorter tends to justify its cost when:

• Teams handle moderate-to-high CV volumes.
• Brand consistency is important to client perception.
• There is internal willingness to fine-tune templates and workflows in the first weeks.

Where we see risk is in teams expecting “zero-touch” perfection; Allsorter is best viewed as a major accelerator, not a full replacement for human review.