Number of Seats/Users: Inspectivity offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Inspectivity that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Inspectivity. Inspectivity reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Inspectivity offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Inspectivity. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Inspectivity often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Inspectivity is delivering strong value for asset-heavy teams moving away from paper-based inspections.

From what our Spendbase clients share, a few themes stand out clearly:

1) Impact on productivity and workflow
– Significant time savings in both field inspections and office reporting
– Faster engineering assessments and repair scoping
– Consistent, standardised reports across teams and locations
– Offline mobile use keeps work moving in remote or offshore environments

2) Flexibility and no‑code customisation
Spendbase clients consistently highlight:
– Highly flexible form builders (cell forms, measurements, text, dependencies, calculations)
– Customisable equipment trees and asset hierarchies
– Tailored data exports and reports, plus REST API integration into existing CMMS
– Ability to adapt workflows to different equipment types and inspection regimes

3) User experience and adoption
Our internal data shows that:
– The UI is simple and visually clean, making training easier
– Once initial resistance from long‑time Word/Excel users is overcome, adoption grows quickly
– Bulk actions and hotkeys improve everyday efficiency
– Some teams note a learning curve due to the platform’s depth and flexibility, so structured onboarding is important

4) Support and partnership
Spendbase clients are very positive about:
– Fast, responsive technical support
– Willingness to implement suggestions and iterate features
– Strong industry knowledge, especially in hazardous areas (EEHA) use cases

5) Pain points and limitations
There are a few recurring challenges:
– Mobile app currently focused on Android; iOS field use is limited
– Hardware issues (tablet overheating, glare) when used outdoors, requiring careful device selection
– Knowledge base navigation can feel complex
– Form maintenance can be time‑consuming when making bulk changes
– Large PDF report sizes can stress older internal systems

In Spendbase terms, Inspectivity tends to reduce hidden operational costs around inspections (paper handling, manual reporting, inconsistent data), while adding value through better asset insight and easier integration with existing maintenance systems. For teams ready to invest a bit in training and setup, our internal data suggests the return on efficiency is notably strong.