Number of Seats/Users: {post.post_title} offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows {post.post_title} that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. {post.post_title} reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: {post.post_title} offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: {post.post_title} often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Kodak Info Input Solution is generally seen very positively by Spendbase clients, especially for performance and reliability, but there are clear cost sensitivities you can leverage in negotiations.

Key positive themes our clients highlight:

• Strong performance at scale
• High throughput and reliability for large capture environments
• Works well as a “front door” to broader document and BPM ecosystems

• Often outperforms legacy tools like Kofax in speed and stability

• Flexible architecture

• Decoupled design: export servers can be separated from core processes, which improves processing speed
• Works across distributed locations and service bureaus

• Handles both paper and digital sources with complex document types

• Usability and configurability

• Intuitive, web-based interface with minimal training required
• Highly customizable workflows to fit business-specific processes

• No‑code configuration is seen as a real time-to-value driver

• Business impact

• Good fit for accounts payable, claims, onboarding, and other document-heavy workflows
• Helps standardize document capture across organizations
• Several clients mention it has proven its total cost of ownership over time

At the same time, our internal feedback points to consistent friction points where discounts and better terms are often achievable:

• Licensing and pricing pressure
• Overall price point is perceived as high, especially for mid-sized teams
• Professional services for configuration and customization are seen as expensive

• OCR being an “added cost” rather than included in base licensing is a recurring concern

• Adoption barriers

• Some Spendbase clients mention that the solution is not widely promoted, which makes internal stakeholder buy‑in harder
• Cost sensitivity sometimes slows or limits rollout to all departments or sites

From a Spendbase discount perspective, this pattern suggests good leverage around:

• Bundling OCR and advanced capture modules into core licensing
• Reducing or capping professional services fees for initial configuration
• Multi-site or multi-entity pricing for organizations standardizing on Kodak Info Input
• Volume-based discounts tied to scan volume or number of processes onboarded

In short, clients value Kodak Info Input Solution for high performance, flexibility, and usability, but they consistently push back on licensing and services costs—exactly where we see the best room to negotiate savings.