Number of Seats/Users: {post.post_title} offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows {post.post_title} that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. {post.post_title} reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: {post.post_title} offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from {post.post_title}. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: {post.post_title} often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Manna is appreciated most for what it connects, but there’s consistent feedback about how it feels to use.

From what Spendbase clients share with us, the main strengths are:

• Unified performance view
• Easy to pull data from Google and Facebook into one place
• Clear alignment of ecommerce revenue with ad spend, helping teams see true ROI

• Especially valued in the context of tracking challenges after iOS 14

• Custom integrations

• High marks for being willing and able to build custom API connections
• Helpful for teams with non-standard data sources or more advanced tracking setups

At the same time, our internal data highlights some recurring friction points:

• User interface and usability
• UI is perceived as outdated and not visually appealing
• Navigation is not intuitive, which slows down daily use

• Compared unfavorably to more modern tools like Data Studio-type experiences

• Setup and integrations

• While custom work is appreciated, connecting new sources can feel harder than with other tools

• Some clients mention needing more guidance or templates during onboarding

• Channel coverage

• Clients are happy with Facebook, Google and Bing coverage
• There’s clear demand for more platforms, with TikTok mentioned most often

From a Spendbase discount and cost-optimization standpoint, our internal conversations with clients suggest:

• Teams see strong value when:
• They actively use the ecommerce + marketing data blend to manage ROI
• They have enough volume across Google/Facebook/Bing to justify a centralized tool
• Perceived value drops when:
• Only a small subset of features is used
• UI friction leads to low adoption across the marketing team

In practical terms, Manna tends to be a good fit for cost-conscious teams that prioritize deep performance tracking and are willing to accept a less polished interface in exchange for strong data blending and custom integrations. Where we usually recommend caution is for teams that place a high premium on modern UX or require broad, out-of-the-box support for many newer ad platforms.