Number of Seats/Users: Nexam offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Nexam that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Nexam. Nexam reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Nexam offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Nexam. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Nexam often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Nexam delivers strong value for organizations that run a lot of exams and care about security, while still needing something very simple to use.

From our Spendbase clients’ feedback, the clearest strengths are:

• Ease of use and onboarding
• Simple, intuitive interface for both exam creators and candidates
• Very smooth setup, no complex installation

• Easy navigation during grading (especially grading one question across all candidates)

• Time and efficiency gains

• Automated grading and clear marking workflows
• Several clients mention saving up to ~70% time on exam administration and correction

• Fast publication of results and helpful summary dashboards (averages, rankings, global stats)

• Service and support quality

• Highly responsive, “solution‑oriented” support team
• Strong hand-holding during onboarding and exam sessions

• Technical support for students is especially appreciated

• Security and reliability

• Secure environment that reassures institutions in regulated or high‑stakes contexts
• Identity verification, video capture and event logs are seen as real differentiators

• Non‑intrusive approach, which helps with user acceptance

• Flexibility of use cases

• Works well for higher education, professional exams, and corporate training
• Hybrid setups (in‑person and remote) are supported without extra complexity

Our internal data also highlights some recurring gaps and feature requests:

• Platform autonomy
• Some Spendbase clients would like full autonomy to assemble exams and configure all parameters without needing Nexam’s team.
• Grading UX improvements
• Keep reference images visible during correction
• Better handling of pasted Excel tables in answer sheets
• Easier access to exam documents after grading
• Exam features
• Ability to answer directly within images/schemes (fill‑in‑the‑blank on visuals)
• Multi‑language interface options
• Technical aspects
• Occasional friction related to software updates for students
• Environment feels less controlled when going outside core features

From a spend-optimization perspective, Nexam tends to be a strong fit where:

• There is high exam volume and manual grading overhead
• Security, integrity, and audit trails really matter
• Teams value premium support and are okay with slightly less autonomy in exchange for that

If you share this profile, Nexam usually delivers a solid ROI, both in time saved and in reduced operational risk.