Number of Seats/Users: Treasy offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows Treasy that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from Treasy. Treasy reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: Treasy offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from Treasy. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: Treasy often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that Treasy is generally very well received by Spendbase clients, especially those moving from Excel to a more structured budgeting process.

From what we see, the strongest value drivers are:

• Budgeting & forecasting
• Clear control of budget vs. actual (orçado x realizado)
• Good visibility of margins, OPEX, centers of cost, DRE and cash-flow impacts
• Helpful for multi-company groups and consolidation across CNPJs

• Scenario analysis and what‑if simulations (though some clients say they still underuse this)

• Ease of use & implementation

• Cloud-based and relatively quick to roll out
• Intuitive interface for day-to-day use

• Helps spread a participative budgeting culture, even with many non-finance users

• Service & methodology

• Very strong support and consulting are mentioned repeatedly
• Financial modeling coaching and help with assumptions is seen as a big bonus
• Clients feel “accompanied”, not just sold a tool

On the friction side, Spendbase clients tend to highlight:

• Reporting & dashboards
• Limited customization of reports and dashboards
• Desire for richer visuals and more flexible main dashboards

• Requests for easier comments/annotations directly in the tool

• User management & security

• Permission structure (Full / Edit / View) feels too rigid

• Some confusion around account security and what each role can do

• Data model & imports

• Pain points with plan of accounts:
  • Inability to delete unused accounts
  • Desire to adjust accounts per budget without affecting all plans
• Import flows that force double work (e.g., same data for budget and actual)

• Specific gaps around personnel cost imports

• Integrations & ecosystem

• Many use spreadsheets as a bridge because real-time ERP integrations are limited

• Specific complaints about lack of integration with some ERPs and Power BI

• Pricing perception

• Overall seen as good cost–benefit
• But per-user pricing escalates quickly when teams grow

From a Spendbase savings angle, Treasy tends to pay off in:
– Reduced manual Excel work
– Faster monthly close and better decision speed
– Clearer visibility on profitability and cash flow

The main optimization levers we’d look at with clients are user-seat count, integration scope (to cut spreadsheet work), and whether advanced modules are actually being used.