Number of Seats/Users: We-Connect offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows We-Connect that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from We-Connect. We-Connect reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: We-Connect offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from We-Connect. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: We-Connect often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that We-Connect is generally seen as a high-ROI LinkedIn outreach tool, especially for teams focused on lead generation and networking at scale.

From what our Spendbase clients share, the main positives cluster around:

• Time savings & automation
• Automates connection requests, follow-ups, endorsements, likes, and messages.
• Typical feedback mentions saving 1–10 hours per week on LinkedIn tasks.

• Cloud-based sending (no always-on browser/extension) is a clear win.

• Ease of use (after setup)

• Simple, minimalist interface that feels “practical” rather than bloated.

• Easy to build campaigns and message sequences once users understand the flow.

• Business impact

• Strong outcomes: more booked calls, webinar registrations, new clients, and thousands of new connections over time.

• Many clients describe the price as “good value” or “overwhelmingly valuable” given the conversion they see.

• Support & product velocity

• A lot of positive notes about fast chat responses and engineers who implement feedback.
• Clients appreciate regular updates that track LinkedIn’s changing rules.

At the same time, our internal data shows some consistent friction points:

• Onboarding & UX
• Early setup can feel confusing; not always “super intuitive.”

• Lists and campaigns can be hard to mentally organize at first.

• Support expectations

• Some clients report robotic scripted responses, limited weekend coverage, and the lack of phone support as pain points.

• A minority mention issues not being fully explained (e.g., lower imported contact counts vs Sales Navigator).

• Functionality gaps & bugs

• Requests for: more detailed statistics, better inbox filters, richer lead fields, ability to mix campaign types, invite-to-follow-page features, and a desktop/app option.
• Occasional glitches: sequences not stopping after replies, slow performance, small bugs that need escalation, and LinkedIn captcha/complaints around automation.

From a Spendbase cost-optimization perspective, We-Connect tends to make the most sense for:

• Teams already active on LinkedIn (especially with Sales Navigator)
• Those willing to accept a short learning curve and chat-based support
• Organizations where even a small uplift in meetings or pipeline more than covers the license cost