Number of Seats/Users: WE.VESTR offers discounts based on the number of users or seats. A higher volume typically leads to a better discount structure, especially for enterprise-level usage.

Commitment to a Long-Term Contract: Discounts are often provided to companies that commit to using the service for a longer period (e.g., 1-year or 3-year contracts). A longer commitment shows WE.VESTR that the company is serious and willing to invest in the platform long-term.

No Active Discounts: Companies that are not already receiving other active discounts may have a better chance of qualifying for additional discounts from WE.VESTR. WE.VESTR reserves discounts for new customers or those not currently under promotional pricing.

Volume or Usage Commitment: WE.VESTR offers discounts if you agree to a minimum amount of usage or transaction volume. This could be based on data storage, transactions, or other metrics tied to how much you will use the platform.

Enterprise-Level Negotiation: Companies that qualify as “enterprise” due to their size or complexity (e.g., having large teams, multiple departments, or geographical presence) may be eligible for additional discounts from WE.VESTR. Such companies are often in a position to negotiate for better pricing.

Early Renewal or Prepayment: WE.VESTR often offers discounts if you renew early or prepay for the entire contract period. This is a common approach to securing a lower price.

Here at Spendbase our internal data shows that WE.VESTR performs very strongly on usability, transparency, and perceived value for money, with only a few gaps around integrations and advanced analytics.

Key positive themes our Spendbase clients highlight:

• Clarity of equity data
• Clear, real-time cap table overview
• Easy to share with external shareholders and investors

• Strong sense of control and reduced confusion around ownership

• Ease of use and design

• Very intuitive interface
• Visually attractive dashboards

• Minimal onboarding time for founders and investors

• Investor relations

• Simple way to keep investors informed without endless emails
• Central place to store key documents and KPIs

• Investors can self-serve information, saving founder time

• Employee equity & engagement

• ESOP functionality is perceived as a big plus where it’s available
• Helps keep employees engaged by showing them their stake

• Supports a culture of shared ownership and transparency

• Value for money

• Frequently described as “a no brainer” for the price point
• Strong ROI vs manual spreadsheets and fragmented tools

Main friction points our internal data shows:

• Feature gaps
• Earlier versions lacked employee equity management; this is now being filled with ESOP features

• Missing KPI vs goal comparison in the dashboard, a commonly requested enhancement

• Integrations

• Clients would like tighter integrations with other finance and HR tools
• Expectations are that upcoming releases will solve a big part of this

From a Spendbase savings perspective, WE.VESTR tends to:

• Reduce time spent on cap table and investor updates
• Lower risk of costly equity mistakes versus manual tracking
• Delay the need for more expensive enterprise equity tools for many startups

In short, our internal data shows that WE.VESTR fits best for startups and scaleups that want:

• Clean cap table clarity
• Simple ESOP and investor communication
• A cost-effective tool that will keep improving with new features over time.